Monday, March 23, 2020

SOME FACTS REGARDING 40B DEVELOPMENT - CURRENT PROPOSED 40B PROJECTS IN SHERBORN


-->

In addition to the three under construction, there are currently three other 40B projects pending in Sherborn. There is also a 4th project that is not a 40B but is closely related to one of the 40B’s. In fact, the total of 4 projects should really be discussed as two pairs of projects since two of the 40B’s are also closely related.

The Pines Residences/Apple Hill Estates
The first pair of projects to be discussed are the pair of 40B’s. They are called the Pines Residences and Apple Hill Estates. They are located at 41 North Main Street and 31 Hunting Lane respectively. The Pines Residences is a 60-unit apartment building with 15 affordable units (again, all 60 units would count toward the Town’s SHI percentage). It is proposed as a mostly 3-story building but with a partial 4th story. Apple Hill Estates is proposed to add 27 units to the existing single-family home on a 17-acre parcel. It should be noted that Town Boards have unanimously opposed these projects.

The Pines Residences and Apple Hill Estates are separate projects on abutting sites and under the same ownership (Barsky Estate Realty Trust). One is a rental and one is a homeownership project. They are further linked through a shared water supply and a shared wastewater treatment plant. The site is bisected by the MBTA railroad tracks (which provide only freight service).

The projects do not technically abut because, in addition to the railroad tracks, there are two other parcels of land between them under the same ownership. However, one of these parcels is the site of the proposed wells that would be the water supply for the projects. The other parcel would not be part of the development except that the water lines from the wells would pass through it to serve Apple Hill Estates.Sewer lines from The Pines Residences would also cross this parcel.

As noted above, Apple Hill Estates would consist of 27 additional units bringing the total to 28 since there is an existing single-family home on the parcel. There would be 12 duplex buildings (24 units) plus a triplex. Seven of the units would be required to be affordable. The road serving the development would extend from Hunting Lane then loop back on itself. A wastewater treatment plant would be located along the road and the leaching field would be located at the far end of the parcel. The site plan can be viewed here:

The Pines Residences consists of 60 apartments in a  single 3 to 4-story single building. The building would be set back 60 feet from both North Main Street and Hunting Lane except for a 45-foot setback at one corner where Hunting Land bends to the south. The primary access would be off North Main Street where there is an existing small curb cut serving the existing cottage on the property. An emergency-only access from Hunting Lane is also proposed. The parking is mostly to the rear of the building with a few spaces on the side.

The project site now includes the parcel that extends to Powderhouse Lane, though neither vehicular nor pedestrian access is proposed to connect with Powderhouse Lane. It should also be noted that the historic Whitney-Paul Tavern is on a separate parcel, and is not a part of this project.

STATUS: These projects are both awaiting a determination by MassHousing as to whether it warrants a Project Eligibility Letter

Meadowbrook Commons/Coolidge Crossing
These projects have been in the works for a few years. They originally started out as two adjacent 40B projects. In a manner somewhat similar to the Pines Residences and Apple Hill Estates, one was ownership and one was a rental. They were each about 88 units, and they would share a water supply and a wastewater treatment facility. The original developer was Trask Development. Upon Town negotiation, Trask agreed to instead propose an age-restricted development under the EA (Elderly -Affordable) multi-family development provision on one of the sites and reduce its unit count to 67.

Trask then prepared a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) for 67 age-restricted units of which 60 would be market rate and 7 (10%) would be affordable. A special Town Meeting was held on December 5, 2017 to approve the PDP and change the zoning of the parcel to EA. In one of the largest attendances at Town Meeting in years, the project was overwhelmingly approved with 86% in favor.

The approval was due, in large part, to the understanding that the adjacent 40B apartment project would share infrastructure and be developed at the same time, which would provide 88 units to the Subsidized Housing Inventory and bring Sherborn close to or above 10% (depending on the timetable of the other 40B projects under construction). With a 10% target of 148 units, the 93 total units provided by these two projects along with the 34 existing and 23 under construction would bring the total to 150. At a minimum, it would provide two years of safe harbor.

One downside of the projects was that the apartment building would be a huge 3 to 4 story L-shaped structure far out of scale with Sherborn’s character. In reviewing the application for its 40B Project Eligibility Letter, Mass Housing Partnership recognized this inconsistency and asked the developer to consider design changes to soften the aesthetic impact on the town. While the developer agreed to consider this, several months passed with little to no communication from the developer.

Finally, the Town was contacted by representatives of Pulte Homes of New England. They indicated that they would likely be taking over the project, but that they only developed ownership projects, not rentals. They stated that they would try to find another developer to assume responsibility for the rental project. The Town emphasized to Pulte that the apartment building was a key component of the project, and later an apartment developer was identified by Pulte.

As Pulte considered the projects, some changes were made. The affordable units in Meadowbrook Commons were scattered throughout the project in accordance with DHCD requirements. More importantly, negotiations were initiated with the City of Framingham to supply water to both projects, and with the Town of Natick to provide sewer service. This would mean that the onsite wastewater treatment plant and the wells would be eliminated, providing a little more flexibility on the design of the building and site.

Another major benefit of the water being supplied by Framingham is that it would eliminate additional stress on the existing wells in the neighborhood. It would also avoid any impact on the plume of contamination from the General Chemical site in Framingham that could potentially be drawn toward Sherborn if there was a major water withdrawal as a result of the projects. In September 2019 the Sherborn Select Board agreed to allow soli borings along Kendall Avenue and Coolidge Street to help determine whether installing a water line along that route would be financially feasible.

No agreements have yet been made on the water and sewer services from abutting communities. Intermunicipal Agreements would need to be approved before any such service could be available. In any case, the concept at this point is that none of the municipalities would own the infrastructure for that service. It would be owned and maintained by the condominium association of Meadowbrook Commons and the management of Coolidge Crossing.

STATUS: The projects are proceeding together though they have different permitting tracks. Meadowbrook Commons needs to apply to the Planning Board for a special permit while Coolidge Crossing needs to apply for a 40B Project Eligibility Letter (PEL) from DHCD. The Coolidge Crossing developers would like to develop it as a Local Initiative Project (LIP), or friendly 40B, which means they would need a vote of support from the Select Board prior to applying to DHCD. Both developers are currently scheduled to appear before the Select Board on April 9 to provide more details on the projects and to discuss the LIP. Assuming a PEL is issued, Coolidge Crossing would then need to apply to the ZBA for a comprehensive permit.

Epilogue: I have received inquiries about potential 40B projects for other parcels in Town, but so far they have not advanced.

Friday, March 20, 2020

SUMMARY OF SHERBORN’S CURRENT 40B STATUS




The previous post described the three 40B projects that are currently under construction in Sherborn. Upon completion, they will produce a total of 92 housing units, of which 23 (25%) will be affordable and will be added to Sherborn’s Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI).

So, how does that impact our 40B status? Sherborn currently has 34 affordable units on the SHI. These include 24 units from Woodhaven (6 affordable but they are all rentals so all units count) and 10 from Leland Farms (Leland Farms also has 7 market rate units). These 34 units bring our SHI percentage to 2.3%.

The total number of housing units that the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) uses as a base (denominator) for calculating the percentage of affordable units is 1479. This figure is from the 2010 U.S. Census. While more housing has been built in Sherborn since 2010,  DHCD only adjusts the base every ten years with each U.S. Census.

If the projects under construction were all completed, the 23 affordable units added to the 34 we already have would bring our SHI total to 57 units and the percentage would increase to 3.85%. In order to reach 10%, we need to reach a total of 148 units. We would be short 91 units. Furthermore, since its 2020, it’s a U.S. Census year and our denominator is about to be adjusted upward. It takes about a year for the initial U.S. Census population and housing figures to be released. While we will not know the exact figure until then, I estimate that our new number will be about 1550 (possibly less).

Using 1550, we would need 8 more units (156 total) to reach 10%. Thus, we would be 99 short, even with all of the current projects completed and occupied.

SOME FACTS REGARDING 40B DEVELOPMENT - PREVIOUS 40B PROJECTS IN SHERBORN





Meadows Edge at Whitney Farm
The first Chapter 40B project in Sherborn was Whitney Farm (now known as “Meadow’s Edge at Whitney Farm”). While construction activity has been relatively recent, the project was initiated about 20 years ago. In any case, for various reasons construction was delayed but did start a few years ago. That project consists of 48 units, of which 12 (25%) will be affordable. The units are mostly single-family homes with some duplexes mixed in. Lotteries have been held to select the buyers of the affordable units. About 15 units have been constructed so far.

The development site is about 27 acres. It is located on Whitney Street and also abuts the Sherborn section of the Upper Charles Trail. The developer has provided an easement for some parking just off Whitney Street and a trail from there to connect to the Upper Charles Trail. The Town has obtained a grant to construct that connecting trail.

The Fields at Sherborn
More recently, there have been two 40B projects approved by the ZBA. One of these is “The Fields at Sherborn.” This project consists of a total 32 units of townhouses, configured in 9 buildings with 2, 3 or 6 units each.  Eight of the units will be affordable. This project was initially proposed as 36 units. Through negotiations with the developer, the unit count was reduced to 32 units. Then, since one of the buildings was very close to wetlands, the developer agreed to eliminate that building and relocate and reduce the size of some units to maintain the unit count at 32.

The development site is about 17 acres but much of that is wetland so about half represents the developed area. It is located on Washington Street (Route 16) and abuts the Holliston town line at the rear of the property. According to its web site, about 22 of the 32 units have been sold or reserved.

59 North Main
This is the latest of the three active 40B developments in Sherborn. It consists of 12 single family homes, of which 3 are affordable. They are laid out around a circular road with a green space in the middle. It is an age-restricted development so at least one member of the household must be 55 years old or older in order to live there.